ED crowding presents obvious operational and logistic problems for hospitals, and raises serious ethical concerns [11,12]. The moral problems posed by ED boarding and resultant crowding have a variety of undesirable consequences such as increased patient sellectchem waiting times, decreased ability to protect patient privacy and confidentiality, impaired evaluation and treatment, and difficulties in delivering person-centered care [13]. This study uses a previously unused
data source that captures ED visits Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical for entire states to explore ED LOS by admission hour, day of the week, patient volume, patient characteristics, hospital characteristics, and area characteristics. ED visits are limited to those in which the patients are treated and released (T&R), i.e., not admitted to the same hospital. The study contributes to the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical existing literature in the following important way: Existing studies examining emergency department LOS, crowding, and resource use generally employ data drawn from a sample of ED visits, obtained from a survey, Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical or tracked as part of a before-after intervention study [13]. One of the largest
of these data filesa is a nationally representative sample of 138,569 ED visits over a 5-year period [2]. In contrast, our data file includes 4.9 million ED visits in a single year. Healthcare policies designed to provide solutions to increased ED LOS, ED crowding, and related issues may produce better outcomes when they are based on large databases. Such large databases may shed light on the wide variations in utilization patterns of ED services and the significant differences in patient-related and market-specific factors [14]. Our findings may Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical inform public and private policymakers on a broad range of issues including, but not limited to, Monday volume, impact of hospital bed size and hospital status on the average duration of T&R ED visits, and differences in duration by race. Methods Study design and population We conducted a retrospective data analysis to investigate the duration of ED visits using the Healthcare Cost and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Utilization Project
(HCUP)b State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for 2008. HCUP is maintained Cilengitide by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). HCUP databases are publicly available for all researchers and can be purchased through the HCUP Central Distributor.c The SEDD employed in this study include data on 4.9 million T&R ED visits in three states: Arizona, Massachusetts, and Utah. In general, the SEDD provide detailed diagnoses and procedures, total charges, and patient demographics. Demographics include gender, age, race, and expected payment source (e.g., Medicare, Medicaid, private insurance, other insurance, and self-pay). However, the SEDD from these three states also provide admission and discharge time for 99.