2006). Selecting a particular visual angle for a task has been shown to facilitate reading

a book (Schmidt et al. 1993; Shieh and Lee 2007) and “improve task performance” (Sommerich et al. 2001). Thus, there is considerable evidence that altering the visual angle can influence postural and voluntary movement control. Pancreatic cancer However, the mechanism of this effect is unclear. As people move their eyes and bodies during normal daily selleckbio activities they alter the position of their eyes in the orbits (gaze angle), the image projection on the eye retina as observed from different points of view (viewing angles), and head position—if viewing Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical an object requires eye movement amplitude beyond that achieved with eye movement alone. The contribution of each specific factor to the motor control and specifically to the visual stabilization of upright posture is unclear.

Investigation of this question is important and can help our understanding of the mechanism underlying the visuomotor transformation for postural Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical control. In this study, we attempted to dissociate the components of the visual angle to allow investigation of the effect of gaze versus viewing angle on postural stability during quiet stance. Previous research (Ustinova et al. 2010) showed that manipulating the viewing angle in a virtual environment without eye movement altered participants’ performance of functional reaching for a target while standing. This leads us to hypothesize that viewing a target under different perspectives could influence Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical postural stability as well. From a practical standpoint, the results of the study could be used in simulated environments such as

gaming, virtual rehabilitation Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical for balance, and teleoperator training. In these environments, usually presented to participants on a screen or via “head-mounted display,” natural eye movements are limited (Sandor and Leger 1991; Ukai et al. 2001). Consequently, participants experience a conflict between visual information, GSK-3 perception, and eye position signals (Stoffregen et al. 2008). Thus, it is important to determine the best viewing perspective for postural stability or other accurate motor performance in these virtual environments. Methods Participants Twenty females with age range of 23–52 years (29.3 ± 9 years), were recruited from the university community. The project received approval from the university Institutional Review Board (IRB). Participants had no known balance or motor impairments, perceptual problems, or other orthopedic and neurological conditions that would interfere with their ability to perform the experimental task.