01) (Figure 3C, D). Figure 3 GRP78 silencing inhibited the invasion and metastasis of SMMC7721. (A) Transwell analysis of the invasion capability of the cells that stably expressing shGRP78-3. The invaded cells were stained with Hochest33258 and observed using inverted fluorescent microscope, three fields were randomly
chosen and the invasion capabilities of tumor cells were represented as the numbers of the invaded cells per field (scale bar: 25 μm). The experiments were repeated for three Epacadostat price times. (B) Quantitative analysis of the invasive status of the cells that stably expressing shGRP78-3. The values were presented as ± SE and analyzed by one-way ANOVA; (Columns,mean of three separate experiments; bars, SE; *, values significantly different at the 5% levels). (C) Wound healing analysis of the metastasis of the cells that stably expressing shGRP78-3. The confluent cells were wounded by sterile pipettes and the status of wound closure
were observed and photographed after 24 h.the experiment was repeated for three times. (scale bar: 25 μm) (D) Quantitative analysis of the metastasis status of the cells that stably expressing shGRP78-3. The values were presented as ± SE and analyzed by one-way ANOVA; (Columns,mean Palbociclib nmr of three separate experiments; bars, SE; *, values significantly different at the 5% levels). (E) MTT analysis of the proliferation status of the cells that stably expressing shGRP78-3, the experiment was repeated for 3 times in tripilicate and The values were presented as ± SE and analyzed by one-way ANOVA; (Columns,mean of three separate experiments; bars, SE; *, values significantly different at the 5% levels). In order to exclude the possibility that the inhibiton
Staurosporine concentration of the invasion and metastasis of GRP78 knockdown were caused by cell proliferation, we examined the proliferation statsus of C3 and C4 cells using MTT assay. Compared with control cells and parental cells, GRP78 knockdown do not affect the proliferation of SMMC7721 in 24 h, indicating that the inhibitory effect of Grp78 knockdown on the invasion and metastasis was not caused by cell proliferation (Figure 3E). GRP78 knockdown decreased ECM degradation To explore whether GRP78 knockdown influences extracellular matrix degradation, we applied FITC-gelatin degradation assay to access the matrix degradation status of parental, vector transfected, C3 and C4 cells. We observed the FITC-gelatin degradation sites which appear as visible small dots in regions under the cells in parental and vector transfected cells. However, no obvious degradation sites were seen in C3 and C4 cells, indicating that GRP78 knockdown decreased the ability of ECM degradation in SMMC7721 cells (Figure 4A). For the activity and Etomoxir molecular weight expression of Metalloproteinase (MMPs) and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMPs) play critical roles in the ECM degradation [17], we detected the expression of MMP-2, 9, 14 and TIMP-2 in C3 and C4 cells by western blot.