The data represents mean of three biological replicates and SD. Asterisk denotes significant (p<0.05) difference from solvent control (DMSO). (B) Survival of Caco-2 cells in presence of 100 μg/ml limonoids. The cell viability was measured by LDH assay after 6 h of growth in presence

of limonoids. Citrus limonoids repress the LEE, flagellar and stx2 genes Adherence of EHEC to epithelial cells is facilitated by several factors including locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) EGFR inhibitor encoded TTSS, flagella, effector proteins and intimin [46–48]. To determine the probable mode of action, effect of limonoids on expression of six LEE encoded genes ler, escU, escR (LEE1 encoded), escJ, sepZ and cesD (LEE2 encoded), flagellar

master regulators flhDC and stx2 was studied. Isolimonic GSK2126458 chemical structure acid and ichangin exerted the strongest effect on the LEE in EHEC grown to OD600 ≈ 1.0 in LB media. The transcriptional regulator of LEE, the ler, was repressed 5 fold by isolimonic acid, while other LEE encoded genes were down-regulated by 6–10 fold (Table 4). Ichangin treatment resulted in ≈ 2.5-6 fold repression of LEE encoded genes. IOAG repressed the escU, escR, escJ and cesD by 3.2, 2.5, 3.7 and 2.6 fold, respectively while aglycone, isoobacunoic acid did not seem to affect the expression of LEE encoded genes under investigation (Table 4). Similarly, DNAG treatment did not resulted in differential expression of any genes. Furthermore, isolimonic acid repressed the flhC and flhD by 4.5 and 6.9 fold, respectively (Table 4), while

ichangin exposure resulted in 2.8 fold repression of flhC and flhD. IOAG selleck chemicals repressed flhC and flhD by 2.1 from and 2.3 folds, respectively. Isoobacunoic acid and DNAG treatment did not seem to modulate the expression of flhDC (Table 4). Table 4 Expression of LEE encoded, flagellar and stx2 genes in presence of 100 μg/ml limonoids Gene name Ichangin Isolimonic acid Isoobacunoic acid IOAG DNAG ler -3.2 (±2.1) -5.0 (±0.8) -1.4 (±0.3) -1.8 (±0.4) -0.7 (±1.5) escU -5.3 (±0.8) -6.6 (±1.0) -1.6 (±0.1) -3.2 (±0.3) -2.0 (±0.6) escR -2.5 (±0.7) -6.3 (±1.3) -1.7 (±0.3) -2.5 (±1.2) -2.3 (±0.5) escJ -6.2 (±1.0) -12.4 (±2.1) -2.4 (±1.3) -3.7 (±2.0) -1.2 (±2.4) sepZ -2.7 (±0.1) -6.9 (±1.1) -0.7 (±1.5) -1.7 (±0.6) -1.6 (±0.8) cesD -3.5 (±0.7) -10.0 (±1.5) -3.0 (±1.2) -2.6 (±1.7) -1.6 (±0.8) flhC -2.8 (±0.9) -4.5 (±1.3) -1.5 (±0.3) -2.1 (±0.4) -1.3 (±0.3) flhD -2.8 (±0.5) -6.9 (±0.4) -1.8 (±0.5) -2.3 (±0.4) -1.7 (±0.5) stx2 -2.5 (±0.8) -4.9 (±1.0) -1.6 (±0.4) -2.2 (±0.8) -1.2 (±0.1) rpoA -0.3 (±1.8) -0.5 (±1.6) 1.8 (±0.8) 1.3 (±0.4) 1.7 (±0.5) The EHEC ATCC 43895 was grown to OD600≈1.0, RNA was extracted using RNeasy kit and converted to cDNA as described in text.