Piglet isolates (including symptomatic and asymptomatic animals)

Piglet GANT61 molecular weight isolates (including symptomatic and asymptomatic animals) were

from 9 pig farms located in different parts of Slovenia. Poultry isolates were from two big facility for laying hens and three smaller farms. Dog, cat and calf isolates were from different Slovenian households and farms. Stool samples or rectal swabs collected from these animals were processed as described elsewhere [7, 29]. Due to the clustering (i.e. large number of isolates from the same animal farm), only 156 animal isolates (piglets (n = 16), poultry and birds (n = 121), dogs and cats (n = 12), calves (n = 6) and a horse) were included in the final analysis (only a single strain isolated per sampling and per farm). The final number of isolates included in the comparison of prevalence and distribution of PCR ribotypes was 786 (601 from human, 104 from animals and find more 81 from the environment) from the time period 2008-10, as for this time period environmental strains were available. For the PFGE and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of human and animal strains, 50 isolates from broader time interval (2006-2010) were selected. Molecular characterisation All isolates were characterised by toxinotyping and AZD5153 datasheet PCR ribotyping. Toxinotyping involved amplification and subsequent restriction of PCR fragment A3 (part of tcdA) and B1 (part of tcdB). PaLoc negative strains were confirmed by amplification

of a 115 bp-long insert with primers Lok1/Lok3 [34]. The binary toxin gene (cdtB) was detected as described previously [35]. PCR ribotyping was performed with the primers 16S (5′-GTGCGGCTGGATCACCTCCT) and 23S (5′-CCCTGCACCCTTAATAACTTGACC) as described by Bidet et al. (1999) [36]. After amplification PCR products were concentrated to a final volume of 25 μl by heating at 75°C for 45 min before electrophoresis in 3% agarose gel (Bio-Rad, USA) in 1× TAE buffer for 5 h at 2.5 V/cm. BioNumerics software (Applied Maths, Belgium) version 6.10 was used to analyze the banding patterns. PCR ribotypes for which reference strains were available were designated by standard Cardiff nomenclature (002, 029…; 46 Cardiff type

strains were available in our laboratory for comparisons) while others were designated by internal nomenclature (SLO and 3-digit (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate code). A total of 50 C. difficile isolates of the most prevalent PCR ribotypes found in humans and animals isolated between 2006 and 2010 were further analyzed with PFGE and antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Selection of the strains was made by randomly selecting human and animal strains isolated in the same time period and from the same geographic locations covering different Slovenian regions. These included 32 human isolates and 18 animal isolates from pigs (n = 3), poultry (n = 8), a cat (n = 1), calves (n = 2) and dogs (n = 4). Pulsed field gel electrophoresis PFGE was performed as described elsewhere [37].

Comments are closed.