Lateralization for visuospatial memory in the latter group was to

Lateralization for visuospatial memory in the latter group was to the right, the left, or exhibiting a bilateral representation. Means, standard deviations, t-tests, and effect sizes are summarized in Table 3. Children with language lateralized to the left hemisphere showed Selleck Gefitinib significantly better vocabulary and nonword reading skills than children

for whom language was not lateralized to the left hemisphere. However, phonological short-term memory was unrelated to language lateralization (see Table 3). It has been proposed that the development of absolute skill might drive lateralization (Holland et al. 2007; Yamada et al. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 2010). In the case of vocabulary, this would mean that the number of words you know is crucial,

regardless of age. This was not the case. When we repeated the analyses with raw scores for vocabulary (Language Left: M= 109.34, SD= 18.39; Language Other: M= 99.91, SD= 22.43) and nonword reading (Language Left: M= 37.93, SD= 15.17; Language Other: M= Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical 32.18, SD= 14.20), we did not find significant differences between groups (vocabulary: t(53) =−1.19, p= .239, r= .16; nonword reading: t(53) =−1.14, p= .260, r= .15). This suggests that children who had language lateralized to the left hemisphere had better vocabulary and nonword reading skills for their age compared with other Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical children. Figure 3 Scatterplots showing associations between cerebral lateralization and vocabulary knowledge (left panel) and non-word reading (right panel). Open symbols indicate children with language production (LP) and visuospatial memory (VSM) lateralized to different Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical … Table 3 Means (standard deviations), independent t-tests, and effect Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical sizes for performance on cognitive and language tests for children with language production lateralized to the left hemisphere (Language Left) or not (Language Other). Discussion

In this study, we assessed cerebral lateralization for language production and visuospatial memory in a group of 60 typically developing children between the ages of six and 16 years. As has been found Dichloromethane dehalogenase in fTCD studies in adults (Flöel et al. 2001; Whitehouse and Bishop 2009; Lust et al. 2011a, b; Rosch et al. in press), the majority of children showed left-lateralized activation on the language production task and right-lateralized activation on the visuospatial memory task. Our first aim was to assess whether lateralization changed with age. For the language production task, we did not find any association between the direction or the strength of lateralization and age. This is in agreement with other fTCD studies (Lohmann et al. 2005; Haag et al. 2010; Stroobant et al. 2011), but does not tally with the fMRI work (Gaillard et al. 2000; Holland et al. 2001, 2007; Szaflarski et al. 2006a, b).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>