Histological

concordance was defined as agreement of all

Histological

concordance was defined as agreement of all resected mass histologies, eg all clear cell carcinomas. Nuclear grade was considered concordant if all tumors excised were low (Fuhrman 1 or 2, type 1) or high https://www.selleckchem.com/products/defactinib.html (Fuhrman 3 or 4, type 2) grade.

Results: Using our institutional database of 2,569 patients with renal tumors we identified 97 with unilateral synchronous multifocal renal masses. Malignant and benign concordance rates were 77.2% and 48.6%, and histological and grade concordance rates were 58.8% and 51.5%, respectively. In this cohort we identified 76 patients (76.3% male) with a median age of 62.5 years who had a total of 241 unilateral synchronous multifocal renal masses and underwent nephron sparing surgery. Median mass size was 2.0 cm (IQR 1.1-3.1), there was a median of 3 tumors Ubiquitin inhibitor per patient and median followup was 24 months (IQR 13-40). Identified renal cell carcinoma histologies included clear cell in 49.4% of cases, papillary in 33.5%, mixed in 4.5% and chromophobe in 2.8%.

Conclusions: In what is to our knowledge the largest published report of unilateral synchronous multifocal renal masses we document low pathological concordance rates. As such, percutaneous biopsy of a single renal

mass in these patients may not help inform treatment decisions. Nephron sparing surgery may be performed with acceptable oncological and functional results in patients with unilateral synchronous multifocal renal masses.”
“BackgroundThe intrarenal resistive index is routinely measured in many renal-transplantation centers for assessment of renal-allograft status, although the value of the resistive 3-deazaneplanocin A in vitro index remains unclear.

MethodsIn a single-center, prospective study involving 321 renal-allograft recipients, we measured the resistive index at baseline, at the time of protocol-specified renal-allograft biopsies (3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation), and at the time of biopsies performed

because of graft dysfunction. A total of 1124 renal-allograft resistive-index measurements were included in the analysis. All patients were followed for at least 4.5 years after transplantation.

ResultsAllograft recipients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 had higher mortality than those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation (hazard ratio, 5.20 [95% confidence interval CI, 2.14 to 12.64; P<0.001]; 3.46 [95% CI, 1.39 to 8.56; P=0.007]; and 4.12 [95% CI, 1.26 to 13.45; P=0.02], respectively). The need for dialysis did not differ significantly between patients with a resistive index of at least 0.80 and those with a resistive index of less than 0.80 at 3, 12, and 24 months after transplantation (hazard ratio, 1.95 [95% CI, 0.39 to 9.82; P=0.42]; 0.44 [95% CI, 0.05 to 3.72; P=0.45]; and 1.34 [95% CI, 0.20 to 8.82; P=0.76], respectively).

Comments are closed.