For each session, functional images were realigned to the first volume in the time series to correct for motion and coregistered to the T2-weighted structural image from the corresponding scan session. To coregister images across the two scanning sessions, the T2-weighted structural images from each session were coregistered to the T1 SPGR image,

and the coregistration parameters were applied to the corresponding functional images from the same session. Functional images were then resliced to the space of the mean functional image from the second session, high-pass filtered (128 s), and converted to percent signal. All analyses were performed in the native space of each participant; PF-01367338 nmr no spatial smoothing was applied. Pattern classification analyses were implemented using the Princeton MVPA toolbox (http://code.google.com/p/princeton-mvpa-toolbox/) and custom MATLAB code. An anatomically defined mask composed of the visually selective areas of the ventral temporal lobe was used for MVPA classification.

A cortical parcellation of the high-resolution T1 SPGR image was obtained for each participant using FreeSurfer (Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH, Charlestown, MA) and the resulting left and right inferotemporal cortex, fusiform gyrus, and parahippocampal gyrus were combined to serve ISRIB datasheet as the mask for MVPA classification. The classifier was first trained to differentiate object and scene processing on data from the encoding localizer task; we then validated the classifier’s ability to measure reactivation of unseen, recalled content by applying it to data from the guided recall task (see Figure S1 and Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The main goal of the MVPA approach was to assess whether events that overlap with existing memories lead to the reactivation of unseen, related content. To do so, MVPA classifiers trained on the encoding localizer were applied to the encoding data from associative inference paradigm to provide

a measure of content-specific reactivation during overlapping events. For each participant, a regressor matrix labeled the time series by encoding condition (e.g., first repetition of AB associations for OOO triads, Histone demethylase first repetition of AB associations for OOS triads, etc.; 36 time points per condition). To account for the hemodynamic lag, condition labels were shifted back by three scans (6 s) with respect to the functional time series. The mean classifier output for each content class (object, scene) was then extracted for each experimental condition. As the critical measure of reactivation, we assessed the change in classifier output across repetitions of AB associations (last-first AB presentation) where the presented class of content was the same (e.g., two objects for OOO and OOS triads), but the content class of the third, unseen triad member differed (i.e., object versus scene; Figure 2).