For both logos, the width of the vertical red bars is proportional to the frequency of an insertion at that MEK inhibitor position in the model. The width of the subsequent vertical pink bar is proportional to the length of that insertion [Figures prepared using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004), HMMER 3.0 (Eddy 1998), and LogoMat-M (Schuster-Bockler et al. 2004)] Fig. 5 Schematic model of the α-carboxysome assembly containing RuBisCO small (dark green) and large (green) subunits and carbonic anhydrase (red). The shell is composed of hexamers (blue), pseudohexamers (light blue, magenta, and light green), and pentamers (yellow) The structures of the BMC domain: a key building block of the carboxysome shell The

first structures determined from the carboxysome shell were the CcmK2 and CcmK4 proteins from the carboxysome of the β-cyanobacteria this website Vorinostat mw Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (Kerfeld et al. 2005). The structures revealed that the BMC domain forms hexamers with a disk-like shape, giving each a concave and a convex side (Fig. 6). Packing of the hexamers in some of the crystal forms immediately suggested a model for the underlying architecture of the carboxysome shell: the shell proteins formed a two-dimensional layer similar to hexagonal tiles (Fig. 5). CcmK2 formed a uniform layer with all hexamer faces oriented in the same direction whereas CcmK4, in one of two crystal

forms, formed a layer with strips of hexamers alternating between convex and concave orientations (Kerfeld et al. 2005). Fig. 6 Electrostatic comparison of structurally characterized single-domain BMC [PDB:3BN4 (CcmK1), 2A1B (CcmK2), 2A10 (CcmK4), 2G13 (CsoS1A), 3H8Y (CsoS1C)] proteins and pentameric shell proteins [PDB:2QW7 (CcmL), 2RCF (CsoS4A)]. Convex (top), concave (middle), and pore cross-section (bottom) views are shown for each structure. heptaminol Red denotes negative charge; blue denotes positive charge [Figure generated with APBS Plug-in (Baker et al. 2001) for PyMOL] Crystal structures of the CsoS1A (Tsai et al. 2007) and CsoS1C (Tsai et al. 2009) proteins from the α-carboxysome

of Halothiobacillus neapolitanus have also been determined. These displayed the same concave/convex sidedness and uniformly oriented layer formation as observed for CcmK2. Despite a high degree of sequence homology between CsoS1A and CsoS1C (97% identity), a comparison of the electrostatics of these structures shows a difference in the charge distribution on the concave faces (Fig. 6). There is a single amino acid substitution between CsoS1A and CsoS1C at position 97 (from Glu to Gln) that apparently accounts for this difference in electrostatic potential. A superposition of all the single-domain carboxysome BMC protein structures show they share a conserved fold [root mean square deviation (RMSD) range of 0.36–0.71 Å over 66–86 C-α atoms] with only slight differences between the Cso-type homologs from the α-carboxysomes and the Ccm-type homologs from the β-carboxysome (Fig. 7).