© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc Microsurgery 33:401–405, 2013 “

© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 33:401–405, 2013. “
“Unidirectional Doppler is a common diagnostic tool by the Reconstructive Microsurgeons; however, it may generate false signals and surely provides less imaging data as compared to duplex ultrasonography.

We have reviewed the use of Portable Duplex Ultrasonography (PDU) in 16 patients who underwent complex soft-tissue/bone reconstruction, aiming to determine its role in the design and management of free tissue transfer. According to our data, there were modifications either of the surgical plan and/or of patient’s management, based this website on PDU findings, in 10 out of 16 patients (62.5%). The use of ultrasound directed to subtle modifications in three patients (19%), but to significant changes of the surgical plan in four patients (25%). Also, the use of ultrasound improved significantly the postoperative management in three patients (19%). Thus, significant impact of PDU in patient’s treatment was recorded in 44% of cases. Portable ultrasound represents generally available Selleckchem Galunisertib method for preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative diagnosis and decision-making in free tissue transfer, hence could replace

in the near future the unidirectional Doppler in the hands of Microsurgeons. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 30:348–353, 2010. “
“The classical DIEP-flap is considered state-of-the-art in microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction. Some patients may require additional volume to match the contralateral breast. This quality control study prospectively

evaluates the feasibility and outcome of a surgical technique, aminophylline which pursues the volumetric augmentation of the DIEP-flap by harvesting of additional subscarpal fat tissue cranial to the classical flap border. For radiologically based estimation of volumetric flap-gain potential, abdominal CT-scans of 10 Patients were randomly selected and used for computerized volumetric estimates. Surgical evaluation of the technique was prospectively performed between 09/2009 and 09/2010 in 10 patients undergoing breast reconstruction with extended DIEP-flap at two institutions. The outcome regarding size, volume, and symmetry was evaluated. Radiologically, the mean computed volume gain of an extended DIEP was 16.7%, when compared with the infraumbilical unilateral flap volume. Clinically, the intraoperatively measured mean volume gain was of 98.6 g (range: 75–121 g), representing 13.8% of the flap volume. All 10 flaps survived without revision surgery. In three flaps, minor fat necrosis occurred in zone III and was treated conservatively. No fat necrosis was observed in the extended flap area. In this first prospective series, the extended DIEP-flap proved to be feasible, reliable and safe for its use in breast reconstruction.

Comments are closed.