�� In that light, Whitwell [63, page 621] refers to the myth of recovery, meaning ��being restored to your former state (��) as a state of a person, as the 17-DMAG hsp90 end state following a period of illness.�� As an exploration of the experiences of people with mental health problems shows that people are conscious of their impaired life position, describing ��unemployment, divorce, housing problems, lack of money and social isolation�� [63, page 622], a conceptual shift implies moving into a nuanced and social understanding of recovery. Also, Tew et al. [10, page 444, our italics] have recently revealed that recovery ��emphasises rebuilding a worthwhile life, irrespective of whether or not one may continue to have particular distress experiences��and central to this can be reclaiming valued social roles.

(��) Recovery may involve a journey both of personal change and of social (re)engagement��which highlights the importance of creating accepting and enabling social environments within which recovery may be supported.�� Secker et al. [64, page 410, our italics] describe a reconceptualization of recovery that is ��viewed as establishing a dynamic and meaningful life with an impairment (��), the process of recovery involves the reintroduction of the individual into a socially accepting and acceptable environment.�� According to Slade [2, page 703], this social approach to recovery can be summarized as ��recovery begins when you find someone or something to relate to. The job of the system is to support the relationship (��), maintaining an organizational commitment to recovery, and promoting citizenship among individuals in recovery.

�� In our view, these insights refer to the necessity to consider notions and interpretations of citizenship in these social practices as relational and inclusive. 4.1. Relational and Inclusive CitizenshipIn reality, our societies are often characterized by the dynamics of social exclusion and marginalization [67]. The experience of people with mental Carfilzomib health problems of not being recognized as citizens is frequently identified [21, 30�C34] and refers to the discrepancy between their formal citizenship (embodied as an entitlement and a status) and their de facto citizenship (constructed through the experience of being a member of a particular community and society in practice) [46].